Brief & Practical
Eclectic Therapy as an Integration within the ShiftGrit Core Method™
Overview
Eclectic therapy is an approach to psychotherapy in which the clinician draws techniques and interventions from more than one theoretical orientation, selecting methods according to their suitability for a given client and presenting problem rather than adherence to a single school of thought. It is commonly distinguished from integrative therapy, which seeks to combine theories into a unified framework, whereas eclecticism emphasizes practical, technique-level selection without necessarily reconciling the underlying theories.
How it works
The therapist assesses the individual client and then chooses interventions drawn from approaches such as cognitive behavioural therapy, psychodynamic therapy, humanistic or person-centred methods, and behavioural techniques, matching the method to the person, the presentation, and the stage of treatment. In its more formalized expression, called technical eclecticism, technique selection is guided by empirical evidence on what tends to work for a given problem rather than by the theory from which a technique originated.
What it is used for
As a flexible, problem-tailored framework rather than a single protocol, eclectic practice is applied across a broad range of presentations, including anxiety, depression, stress, relationship and interpersonal difficulties, and trauma-related concerns. It is often used when a client's needs span multiple domains or when a single-modality approach is judged insufficient, with the specific techniques applied (for example, exposure, cognitive restructuring, or relational and insight-oriented work) carrying their own respective evidence bases.
Origins and evidence base
Eclecticism in counselling has long-standing roots, but technical eclecticism was notably articulated and developed by psychologist Arnold A. Lazarus, whose 1967 paper "In Support of Technical Eclecticism" and subsequent multimodal therapy (organized around the BASIC ID assessment framework) became influential models from the 1960s and 1970s onward. Because eclectic therapy is a method of selecting and combining interventions rather than one standardized treatment, its empirical support derives largely from the evidence for the constituent techniques and from broader research on common factors and treatment matching, rather than from a single body of trials on "eclectic therapy" as a discrete protocol.
Within the ShiftGrit Core Method™
Sometimes a person needs a steadying skill in the moment, sometimes a fresh way to look at a stuck situation, and sometimes just a little support to carry the work between sessions. Eclectic therapy is how our clinicians decide which of those additions, if any, might genuinely help. Because we are not tied to a single brand of therapy, we can draw a grounding skill from one evidence-based approach or a reframe from another and offer it selectively, fitting the choice to the person in front of us rather than to a formula. What stays steady from one client to the next is the ShiftGrit Core Method™, the through-line that our work is built around. Through Pattern Theory™ and the reconditioning work that is one part of it, the Method is designed to work with the limiting belief that keeps a pattern running, so the old loop can gradually ease its grip. Think of the borrowed techniques less as a fixed toolkit and more as well-stocked shelves our clinicians can reach toward when a particular moment calls for it. Each piece is brought in where it genuinely fits, an evidence-based companion to that steady through-line rather than a replacement for it, and the two are meant to work alongside each other.
Illustrative example
A client comes in carrying the belief "I am at risk," and it surfaces in several parts of life at once: a constant sense of scanning for threat, tension held in the body, and pressure that has built up over a long time. The core work stays the same, as our clinicians draw on Pattern Theory™ and reconditioning to work with the belief underneath the loop. Reading that wider picture, we might also offer a grounding skill to help the client stay steady between sessions, and a thought-tracking tool after reconditioning to gently notice any lingering habit of looking for danger.
Based on: Lazarus, A. A. (1967). In support of technical eclecticism. Psychological Reports, 21(2), 415-416. [source]




